Sattva Group currently has two active residential launches on the same Old Madras Road corridor in East Bengaluru: Sattva Aangane (marketed under the pre-launch codename Courtyard) and Sattva Songbird, further along the road at Budigere Cross. Because both come from the same developer and sit on the same stretch of NH-75, buyers researching one project frequently end up comparing it against the other. This article lays out exactly how the two differ, so you can figure out which one actually fits your budget, timeline and configuration needs, rather than choosing on developer name alone.
1. Quick Comparison Table
| Attribute | Sattva Aangane | Sattva Songbird |
|---|---|---|
| Location | Old Madras Road, near KR Puram / Krishnarajapuram | Budigere Cross, Old Madras Road (NH-75) |
| Project Stage | Pre-launch, EOI open | New launch, under construction |
| Land Area | 10 Acres | 4.33 Acres (Phase 2) |
| Towers / Units | 8 Towers | 2 Towers, 381 apartments |
| Open Space | 80% (2-acre central green) | ~84% |
| Configurations | 3 & 4 BHK, incl. signature duplex | Studio, 1, 2, 2.5 & 3 BHK, plus rowhouses |
| Size Range | 1,800 to 3,000 sq.ft | ~468 to 1,813 sq.ft |
| Starting Price | ₹2.81 Cr* (3 BHK, exclusive EOI) | ₹1.56 Cr* (2 BHK) |
| Clubhouse | 40,000 sq.ft, single clubhouse | 3 dedicated clubhouses |
| RERA Status | To be advised (pre-launch) | Registered: PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/270326/008557 |
*Prices as advertised by the developer at the time of writing; both are subject to change. See our full Sattva Aangane review and Sattva Songbird review for complete detail and sourcing on each project.
2. Location: Two Different Points on the Same Road
Both projects sit on Old Madras Road / NH-75, but at different points along it. Sattva Songbird is positioned at Budigere Cross, opposite the KRN Complex, roughly 300 metres off the highway itself, and squarely within the Whitefield-Budigere growth corridor with quoted drive times of around 30 minutes to Whitefield and 35 minutes to ITPL. Sattva Aangane sits further towards the KR Puram / Krishnarajapuram end of the same road, closer to the KR Puram and Krishnarajapuram railway stations and the Krishnarajapuram metro station, with its own location map showing several other Sattva projects (Songbird, Celesta, East Crest) as reference points nearby.
In practical terms, Sattva Aangane's position is somewhat closer to the established KR Puram / Whitefield core, while Sattva Songbird pushes further out towards Budigere Cross on the growth edge of the same corridor. Neither is objectively "better" located; the right choice depends on which specific workplace, school or family location you're actually commuting to or from.
3. Configuration & Size: Very Different Buyer Profiles
This is where the two projects diverge the most. Sattva Songbird is built around a genuinely wide range, from compact Studio and 1 BHK units around 468 to 756 sq.ft, through 2 and 2.5 BHK options, up to 3 BHK homes around 1,733 to 1,813 sq.ft, plus separate rowhouses. That spread makes it a project that can serve first-time buyers, young professionals and larger families from the same address.
Sattva Aangane, by contrast, only offers 3 BHK (1,800 to 2,300 sq.ft) and 4 BHK (2,600 to 3,000 sq.ft) homes, including a signature duplex layout in Tower 7. It is positioned squarely for buyers who already need a larger family home and are not looking at compact or entry-level configurations. If your budget and space needs point towards a Studio, 1 BHK or 2 BHK, Sattva Songbird is the only one of the two that has an equivalent product; if you need 3 or 4 BHK space with room to spare, Sattva Aangane's larger unit sizes and duplex option are the more relevant comparison.
4. Pricing: Different Stages, Different Starting Points
Sattva Songbird's 2 BHK starts at roughly ₹1.56 Cr for 1,268 to 1,280 sq.ft, working out to around ₹12,200 to ₹12,300 per sq.ft, while its 3 BHK starts at roughly ₹1.88 Cr for 1,733 to 1,813 sq.ft. Sattva Aangane's exclusive EOI pricing starts considerably higher in absolute terms: ₹2.81 Cr for 3 BHK (1,800 to 2,300 sq.ft) and ₹4.15 Cr for 4 BHK (2,600 to 3,000 sq.ft), which works out to a broadly comparable ₹12,200 to ₹16,000 per sq.ft range once you account for the larger unit sizes.
The headline price gap between the two projects is mostly a function of configuration, not one project being inherently more or less competitively priced than the other on a per-sq.ft basis. Sattva Songbird's absolute entry price is lower simply because it offers smaller Studio and 1 BHK units that Sattva Aangane does not; if you specifically need a large 3 or 4 BHK home, the effective per-sq.ft rates on both projects land in a broadly similar band for this stretch of Old Madras Road.
5. Project Stage & RERA: The Most Important Practical Difference
This is arguably the single biggest practical difference between the two. Sattva Songbird is a new launch that is already under construction, with a verified Karnataka RERA registration number (PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/270326/008557) confirmed on record. Sattva Aangane is still at the pre-launch, Expression of Interest stage, meaning it has not yet been formally launched to the public and its RERA registration number has not yet been advised by the developer.
Concretely, this means Sattva Songbird is a project you can currently verify end to end on the Karnataka RERA portal before booking, while Sattva Aangane's EOI pricing is being offered ahead of that registration. Neither situation is unusual for a developer with an active launch pipeline, but they carry meaningfully different risk profiles: buying into an already-RERA-registered, under-construction project is a fundamentally different decision than registering an EOI on a project whose RERA number doesn't exist yet.
6. Amenities: Breadth vs. Depth
Sattva Songbird spreads its amenities across 3 dedicated clubhouses with 50+ facilities in total, reflecting its broader mix of unit types and residents. Sattva Aangane concentrates its amenities into one larger 40,000 sq.ft clubhouse, a 25m lap pool, tennis and pickleball courts, badminton and squash courts, and, distinctively, sky-level amenity decks in every individual tower, plus a dedicated pet park and a separate senior's alcove zone. Both amenity programs are genuinely substantial for their respective scale; Songbird leans towards breadth across more buildings, while Aangane leans towards a single larger clubhouse anchor plus per-tower sky decks.
7. Which One Should You Consider?
If you need a Studio, 1 BHK, 2 BHK or 2.5 BHK home, want a project that's already RERA-registered and under construction, or are prioritising a lower absolute entry price, Sattva Songbird is the more relevant option of the two today. If you specifically need a 3 or 4 BHK family home (or are drawn to the signature duplex layout), are comfortable registering an EOI ahead of formal RERA registration in exchange for early pricing and priority allocation, and want a location closer to the KR Puram / Krishnarajapuram end of the corridor, Sattva Aangane is worth a closer look, with the clear caveat that its RERA registration and possession date are not yet confirmed.
It's also worth noting these two are not mutually exclusive comparisons for every buyer. An investor building exposure to the same developer's presence on this corridor might reasonably consider both at different price points and risk stages, rather than picking one over the other outright.
8. Builder Track Record: Same Group, Same Baseline Trust
Because both projects come from Sattva Group (Salarpuria Sattva), the underlying developer risk is essentially identical between the two. Sattva is one of Bengaluru's most established real estate names, with a large existing portfolio of residential and commercial developments across the city, well beyond just this one corridor. That shared parentage is useful context: whatever differences exist between Aangane and Songbird come down to project-specific factors (stage, configuration, location within the corridor), not a difference in who is building them. Buyers who are cautious about developer risk in general can treat that variable as a wash between the two and focus their diligence on the project-specific details instead: the RERA number (or its absence), the exact tower and floor plan, and the current construction photographs or site visit for whichever project they're leaning towards.
9. A Practical Checklist Before You Decide
Whichever way you're leaning, work through the same short checklist for either project before committing money:
- Confirm the RERA number directly with us, and cross-check it yourself on the Karnataka RERA portal. For Sattva Songbird, also confirm which phase (1 or 2) any quoted price or floor plan actually applies to, since the two carry separate registrations.
- Ask for the exact tower and floor behind any advertised size and price, since both projects offer more than one layout within a given configuration band.
- Get a written possession estimate where one exists (Sattva Songbird, being under construction, should have a clearer timeline than Sattva Aangane's pre-launch EOI stage).
- Compare your actual daily commute, not just the corridor name, since Aangane's KR Puram-end position and Songbird's Budigere Cross-end position can mean a meaningfully different drive depending on exactly where you work.
- Clarify what an EOI payment (if any) actually secures before paying it, particularly for Sattva Aangane, since EOI terms and refundability vary by developer and campaign.
None of this is unique to comparing these two projects specifically; it's the same diligence we'd recommend before any pre-launch or new-launch purchase in Bangalore. The point of running it here is that Aangane and Songbird are similar enough (same developer, same road) that it's tempting to assume the diligence done on one automatically covers the other. It doesn't: they have different RERA statuses, different construction stages and different unit economics, and each needs to be verified on its own terms.
Our Honest Assessment
Sattva Aangane and Sattva Songbird are best understood as two different products from the same developer on the same road, not direct substitutes for each other. Songbird is the safer, more immediately verifiable choice today: it's RERA-registered, under construction, and covers a much wider range of budgets and unit sizes. Aangane is the higher-risk, higher-upside choice: larger, more amenity-dense homes at exclusive pre-launch pricing, but without a RERA number or possession date yet to anchor that price against. Neither is the "wrong" choice in isolation; the right pick depends on whether your priority is configuration fit and immediate legal certainty (Songbird) or larger living space and early access pricing on an as-yet-unregistered project (Aangane). Whichever you're leaning towards, get the current RERA and construction status directly from us before signing anything, since both projects' details can change as they move through their respective stages.
